Is t(11;14) Always a Standard-Risk Cytogenetic Abnormality? Results From GEM05MENOS65 and GEM2012 PETHEMA/GEM Transplantation Trials
Moreno DF, Oriol A, de la Rubia J, Hernández MT, Iñigo MB, Palomera L, de Arriba F, González Y, Teruel AI, Pardo JL, López de la Guía A, Sampol A, Ríos-Tamayo R, Sureda A, Gutiérrez NC, Calasanz MJ, Ramos MLM, Mateos MV, San Miguel J, Lahuerta JJ, Bladé J, Rosiñol L; PETHEMA/GEM group.
CL LYMPH MYELOM LEUK
Purpose: Recent studies describe inferior outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients with t(11;14) treated with novel agents.
Materials and methods: We analyzed 240 NDMM transplant eligible (TE) patients who received triplet induction regimen in the GEM05MENOS65 (bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone - VTD) and GEM2012 (bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone - VRD) clinical trials.
Results: t(11;14) and standard risk (SR) non-t(11;14) were prevalent in 51 (21%) and 189 (79%) patients, respectively. Patients with t(11;14) treated with VTD had a lower overall response rate (ORR) (84% vs. 97%, P = .044) and lower negative minimal residual disease (MRD) (7.7% vs 35.1%, P = .049) after induction, as compared to SR non-t(11;14), while there were no differences in ORR (87% vs. 89%) or negative MRD (13.2% vs. 24.4%, P = .2) for these 2 subgroups in patients treated with VRD. The presence of t(11;14) impacted negatively on PFS in patients with VTD (hazard ratio 2.70; P = .005), while no differences were observed in those treated with VRD.
Conclusion: TE NDMM patients harboring t(11;14) had an inferior outcome compared with SR patients when receiving induction therapy with VTD while no differences were observed when receiving a lenalidomide containing regimen.
Obre a Pubmed